In cases where an employee is alleged to be negligent in causing an accident, the employer admits vicarious liability for that employee, and there are no circumstances supporting punitive or punishment damages (such as intoxication), damage awards are legally limited to compensating the injured parties for their losses. Damage awards intended to punish defendants are legally improper in cases of simple negligence. Nevertheless, plaintiffs intentionally seek to “back door” punitive awards by arguing that employers are not only vicariously liable for the fault of employees, but also liable for their own actions that allegedly caused the employees to be negligent – specifically, negligent hiring, training, supervision and entrustment.
The Martin court held that, in cases in which employers stipulate vicarious liability for the negligence of employees, plaintiffs may still pursue employers for negligent hiring, training, supervision or entrustment. The Martin holding allows and supports the improper tactic of inflaming juries to give “nuclear” awards that are, in fact, improper punitive awards masked as compensatory damages. Louisiana businesses and citizens will be damaged by such verdicts.
HB 324 seeks to legislatively overrule the holding of the Court in Martin and put employers in the same position that they were in before the Martin decision.